User:MuppetArchives/Quality article nominations

A quality article should exemplify Muppet Wiki's very best work. Quality status is given based on merit, as determined by the Muppet Wiki contributors.

Nominations

 * Check the quality article criteria and ensure that the article meets all of them before nominating.
 * Place ===name of nominated article=== under the nomination heading here.
 * Below this title, write your reason for nominating the article and sign with ~.

Casting votes

 * To support a nomination, write *Support: followed by your reasons.
 * To oppose a nomination, write *Oppose: followed by your reasons.
 * To comment on a nomination without voting, write *Comment: followed by your comment.
 * Your vote can be changed at any time. If you change your vote, don't delete the old vote -- that comment is an important part of the discussion. Instead, put a line through the old vote by adding and around the previous comment.

Awarding Quality status

 * A decision is made two weeks from the day that an article is nominated.


 * An article with at least 3 supporting votes (not counting the nomination) and no opposing votes gets Quality status.


 * An article with 2 supporting votes remains on the list for another week. If the article doesn't earn 3 supporting votes by the end of three weeks, it's removed from the nomination slate.


 * An article with 0-1 supporting votes after two weeks is removed from the nomination slate.


 * One opposing vote can "veto" a nomination. There are two ways to deal with an opposing vote. If the article is improved enough to satisfy the person who cast the opposing vote, then it can be removed. If the opposing vote is based on unrealistic or unreasonable criteria, then three supporters can vote to "overturn" the veto. An article with an opposing vote can't be given Quality status until one of those conditions is met.

Sweetums
Nominated September 11th, vote closes September 25th
 * Nominate: A great page about a great character. -- Danny (talk ) 12:56, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Support: A vast improvement, and like Rowlf the Dog, a good model as we gradually try to improve the pages for all the main characters who have been neglected. My only gripe is the citation tag for the bit about the eyes; though it's not in the guidelines and may be just a personal preference, I don't like the idea of "Quality Articles" having citation tags. I think that statement should either be sourced or removed before this gets Quality status. -- Andrew Leal (talk ) 21:40, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Support: I looked at this page recently and thought that this page should become a quality article, and now it's got a nomination! It gets my vote. --Minor muppetz 22:24, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: I agree about the unsourced info. I moved that bit to the talk page, and posted a message on the talk page of the user who posted it. -- Danny (talk ) 23:34, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Mystery Science Theater 3000
Nominated September 11th, vote closes September 25th
 * Nominate: Painstakingly detailed original research, with information you can't find anywhere else. It's only interesting to people who like MST3K, of course, so if you don't know the show, then you don't care about the article. But I think people who know the show will find this valuable and entertaining. -- Danny (talk ) 13:01, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: My only quibble is the image for Star Force: Fugitive Alien II. It shows the title card for the movie, but the description suggests the Muppet relevance lies entirely within the frame scenes. Is it possible to get an image of the cue-card drawing of Rowlf? Other than that, it's a well organized page, and even if you're not a huge fan, fun to browse through and see the variety of Muppet references, from dialogue quips to a Cookie Monster toy. -- Andrew Leal (talk ) 21:38, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: Unfortunately, there are two episodes that I don't have right now -- Star Force and It Lives By Night. They're not available on DVD, so I'm going to see if I can get them from another source. Those two images are placeholders for the moment. -- Danny (talk ) 23:23, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Archive

 * Quality article nominations archives