User:MuppetArchives/Quality article nominations archive 01

Archive of discussions from Muppet Wiki:Quality article nominations.

Wonder Pig

 * Nominate: The article is thorough given the brief exposure she had on The Muppet Show. The production photograph is superior to episode screenshots and best represents the care taken in creating the costume. The article also thoroughly describes the character's origins and connections to the lineage of what she is spoofing. — Scott ( talk ) 20:28, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose: It's a great article, but I don't like that picture. The shadow is weird and distracting to me. We have another Wonder Pig picture on the wiki; Scott and I have traded pictures back and forth a couple times. I hate to be a bitch about it, but there you are. -- Danny (talk ) 15:22, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: What if we were able to come up with another Wonder Pig picture that everybody loved and could support? George B. ''(talk ) 22:17, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Support: Scott changed the picture, and I did some editing on the text. I retract my opposing vote, and now I can happily support the nomination. I think it's a fun, weird article, the kind of detailed analysis that only Muppet Wiki can do. I like the explanations of the different parts of her costume. -- Danny (talk ) 20:05, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Support: A good and fun article. Although it is on the shorter side, it is a very comprehensive look at the subject. -- Brad D. (talk ) 21:02, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Support -- 01:11, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Gorilla Suits

 * Nominate: Thorough, entertaining, well-written, good amount of imagery. — Scott ( talk ) 20:28, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Support: In-depth, informative, good use of images and well written. -- Brad D. (talk ) 06:05, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Support: Yes. Very well-researched, comprehensive. -- Danny (talk ) 15:00, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Support -- Andrew Leal (talk ) 01:11, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Support --Cantus Rock 21:09, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

The Jimmy Dean Show

 * Nominate - Brad D. (talk ) 21:29, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Support - This is filled with great information, has nice supporting pictures and is well-sourced. I like this one. <font color="Blue">George B. ''(<font color="Blue" size="1">talk ) 04:48, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Support - Well researched, even if our current info on appearances is limited. — Scott ( talk ) 04:12, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Support: I agree, I think it's a well-researched and comprehensive page. -- <font color="Blue">Danny (<font color="Blue" size="1">talk ) 15:20, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Support' -- 01:11, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Rowlf the Dog

 * Nominate - <font color="Blue">Brad D. (<font color="Blue" size="1">talk ) 21:29, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Support: It's a nice article, there's a lot of good information. -- <font color="Blue">Danny (<font color="Blue" size="1">talk ) 15:23, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Support' --- <font color="Blue">Andrew Leal (<font color="Blue" size="1">talk ) 01:11, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Support --Cantus Rock 21:03, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Joseph McCarthy

 * Nominate: Well-written, well researched, fascinating read. — Scott ( talk ) 20:28, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: It's a strong article and a fun read, but there's lots of other References articles that are better. The Muppet references are fairly minor. If this were nominated a while from now when we had a lot of other Quality articles, then I would vote yes, but for now, I think we could find better examples. -- <font color="Blue">Danny (<font color="Blue" size="1">talk ) 20:05, 15 January 2007 (UTC)