User:MuppetArchives/Quality article nominations

A quality article should exemplify Muppet Wiki's very best work. The award is given based on merit.

Nominations

 * Check the quality article criteria and ensure that the article meets all of them before nominating.
 * Place ===name of nominated article=== under the nomination heading here.
 * Below this title, write your reason for nominating the article and sign with ~.

Casting votes

 * To support a nomination, write *Support: followed by your reasons.
 * To oppose a nomination, write *Oppose: followed by your reasons.
 * To comment on a nomination without voting, write *Comment: followed by your comment.
 * Your vote can be changed at any time. If you change your vote, don't delete the old vote -- that comment is an important part of the discussion. Instead, put a line through the old vote by adding and around the previous comment.

Awarding Quality status

 * A decision is made two weeks from the day that an article is nominated.


 * An article with at least 3 supporting votes (not counting the nomination) and no opposing votes gets Quality status.


 * An article with 2 supporting votes remains on the list for another week. If the article doesn't earn 3 supporting votes by the end of three weeks, it's removed from the nomination slate.


 * An article with 0-1 supporting votes after two weeks is removed from the nomination slate.


 * One opposing vote can "veto" a nomination. There are two ways to deal with an opposing vote. If the article is improved enough to satisfy the person who cast the opposing vote, then it can be removed. If the opposing vote is based on unrealistic or unreasonable criteria, then three supporters can vote to "overturn" the veto. An article with an opposing vote can't be given Quality status until one of those conditions is met.

From the Balcony
Nominated April 20th, closes May 4th
 * Nominate: -- Brad D. (talk ) 18:24, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Support: Well-formatted.--MuppetVJ 18:36, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Support: It has improved a great deal since the last time I looked at this page. --Minor muppetz 23:43, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose: I agree, this is a very well-put together page. It's complete, and it's got great images. But I just hate the show, and I can't stand the idea of having this in the Quality section. If people feel like this is unfair and want to overturn my vote, then go ahead. I just don't want this page up there. -- Danny (talk ) 03:28, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 'Commet: Well, I liked the show. I understand the fanbase is split on the issue of the show's merits but the article is a quality article, even if the subject it represents isn't a quality program in some eyes. -- Brad D. (talk ) 03:44, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Kermit the Frog Impersonators
Nominated May 3rd, closes May 17th
 * Nominate: Yeah, it's a list page. But it's astonishingly comprehensive, pulling in entries from lots of different sources. It's really fun to browse through, and I imagine that it makes readers feel amazed, puzzled and delighted, not necessarily in that order. The recent addition of Miss Piggy waving her arms is the total clincher for me. That's quality, baby. -- Danny (talk ) 03:24, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Archive

 * Quality article nominations archives