Welcome to Muppet Wiki!
(new) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | You don't get my point, which isn't about what matters to us personally, but to avoid perpetuating rumors. Thinking of them as just as good as or just as official isn't the same as claiming he *is* made by Jim Henson Company (and Disney didn't design the character either, but that's potentially another misinterpretation; an outsourced effects company was pretty much given carte blanche based on the script, no doubt with some input and oversight, but), and that's what I was concerned about with the "Muppet robot" sentence and what I want to fix in the intro. It's clear what the consensus is as far as putting the category back, but enough falsehoods get spread around without us adding to it, even just through not being clear enough. That was my point at the very beginning, and that's what I'm trying to get an answer to now. |
+ | You don't get my point, which isn't about what matters to us personally, but to avoid perpetuating rumors. Thinking of them as just as good as or just as official isn't the same as claiming he *is* made by Jim Henson Company, who did do quite a bit of work on the movie via the Creature Shop and also Jane Gootnick's involvement), as it happens (and Disney didn't design the character either, but that's potentially another misinterpretation; an outsourced effects company was pretty much given carte blanche based on the script, no doubt with some input and oversight, but), and that's what I was concerned about with the "Muppet robot" sentence and what I want to fix in the intro. It's clear what the consensus is as far as putting the category back, but enough falsehoods get spread around without us adding to it, even just through not being clear enough. That was my point at the very beginning, and that's what I'm trying to get an answer to now. |
Latest revision as of 22:38, 11 September 2013
You don't get my point, which isn't about what matters to us personally, but to avoid perpetuating rumors. Thinking of them as just as good as or just as official isn't the same as claiming he *is* made by Jim Henson Company, who did do quite a bit of work on the movie via the Creature Shop and also Jane Gootnick's involvement), as it happens (and Disney didn't design the character either, but that's potentially another misinterpretation; an outsourced effects company was pretty much given carte blanche based on the script, no doubt with some input and oversight, but), and that's what I was concerned about with the "Muppet robot" sentence and what I want to fix in the intro. It's clear what the consensus is as far as putting the category back, but enough falsehoods get spread around without us adding to it, even just through not being clear enough. That was my point at the very beginning, and that's what I'm trying to get an answer to now.