No edit summary |
MuppetDude (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tag: Source edit |
||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
::::::Oh, that's perfect. I'd say that solidifies it as official, then. —[[User:Scarecroe|Scott]] <span class="plainlinks">[https://muppet.fandom.com/wiki/Muppet_Wiki:Admins https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/muppet/images/8/89/Adminsig.png/revision/latest?cb=20200820192427]</span> <small>([[User_talk:Scarecroe|talk]])</small> 19:26, 30 March 2021 (UTC) |
::::::Oh, that's perfect. I'd say that solidifies it as official, then. —[[User:Scarecroe|Scott]] <span class="plainlinks">[https://muppet.fandom.com/wiki/Muppet_Wiki:Admins https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/muppet/images/8/89/Adminsig.png/revision/latest?cb=20200820192427]</span> <small>([[User_talk:Scarecroe|talk]])</small> 19:26, 30 March 2021 (UTC) |
||
+ | |||
+ | :::::I know I'm a little late on this, but the old Henson.com site also refers to the young'uns as [https://web.archive.org/web/20010417140501fw_/http://www.henson.com/fcreature/koozebanian_fcreature.html pups]. --[[User:MuppetDude|Tony]] ([[User talk:MuppetDude|talk]]) 19:57, 30 March 2021 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 19:57, 30 March 2021
Forums: Index > Article Content > Baby Koozies
Participation in the Muppet Wiki Forums requires a full understanding of the Rules and Etiquette.
This Copyright Catalog listing from 2004 (registration # RE0000897115 if the link doesn't work) refers to the Baby Koozebanian Creatures as "Koozbanian pups," as does the label at the MOMI exhibit. Anyone support a name change? - Oscarfan (talk) 00:21, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
- The link doesn't work. How do I look it up with the reference number? —Scott (talk) 18:35, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
- Go to the main page, type lowercase re0000897115 in the box, make sure the search by registration number option is chosen (which is where the lowercase instruction is), blick "Begin Search." Here's the most pertinent text: "Koozebanian pup. By Henson Associates, Inc. Copyright Claimant: Jim Henson Company, Inc. (PWH) Basis of Claim: New Matter: puppet."
- Looking around, I found some other cryptic names like "Darlene Whack" and "Jonathan Whack" registered in 1985. Whether for something unproduced or some bit characters whose names we never knew, who knows. -- Andrew 18:51, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for the instructions. It seems that URLs are session-based, but if you generate the link as a search query, like this, it sets you up for a new search with the correct parameters.
- And yeah, I like "Koozebanian Pups" as a proper name for our Baby Koozebanian Creatures article, which I think we just came up with because it was descriptive. I don't see any conflicts in materials I've gotten from Henson otherwise, so yeah, let's go with it. —Scott (talk) 19:13, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
- It's less klunky too, so I third the motion. -- Andrew 19:16, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
- FWIW - in addition to the MOMI exhibit placards and copyright listing, Jim Henson's Red Book used the term "Koozebanian Pups" in a post from 2011 as well. - BradFraggle (talk) 19:23, 30 March 2021 (UTC)