ATTENTION

TALK PAGES ARE NO LONGER USED

To discuss article changes, please use:

THE FORUM

If you see comments on this page, they remain for archive purposes.

NEWLY ADDED COMMENTS WILL BE REMOVED

Title

If this was written, created and filmed in December 2006 why is this titled the "2007 Presentation Pilot"? Wouldn't "2006 Presentation Pilot" or "Muppet Mockumentary Pilot" or something like that be better. Where did the name for this article come from? -- Brad D. (talk) 20:28, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

The article was created by an industry insider who has chosen to remain anonymous. While Goelz states that this was shot in December 2006, it's likely that the reel didn't start making the rounds until after the new year. —Scott (talk) 23:06, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Category

Shouldn't this be in the Pilots and Pitches category? I just noticed that it wasn't. SarahOnBway 03:41, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

In-Development

This article is categorized as "In development", but I was under the impression that this pilot was already produced when this page was added. The way the articles written, it sounds to me like it is finished. This should be moved to "Pilots and Pitches" instead. The series is in development, but as far as I know the presentation pilot has already been produced. --Minor muppetz 03:18, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

The article is about the larger project, though, which is exactly that, still in development. "Development" covers "upcoming films, television series, merchandise and other productions that have not been released yet, but are planned to be produced in the near future." That's everything from initial sketches and PR announcements through the *unaired* pilot phase, until it either produces something, or is clearly abandoned and goes into Category:Unfinished Projects. We don't have a name for the series yet, so all the info is covered here. -- Andrew Leal (talk) 03:24, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Confirmation

User:3dguy posted this article, based on some inside information that he has. I'm asking a friend to see if he can get some confirmation about it, so that we can be sure that 3dguy's info is accurate. I don't know if two "anonyfrog" sources are more convincing than one, but it'll help. This info has the ring of truth to me. -- Danny (talk) 11:23, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Well here are some other sources: [1] -- Brad D. (talk) 14:49, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
Oh, that's fantastic -- I don't trust Cory (Beaker) from MC, but Greg's Newsflash post sounds true. -- Danny (talk) 14:53, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
Er, not that I've ever had any reason to dis-trust Cory, but he really couldn't be considered a "source" for the pilot information. My reason for saying that is because I was the one who originally brought his attention to what was posted about it on this site, and then he went onto the Newsflash and got more info. And, by the way, Greg's Newsflash is pretty much ALWAYS trustworthy. --Gribbaziggy 22:45, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.

Fandom may earn an affiliate commission on sales made from links on this page.

Stream the best stories.

Fandom may earn an affiliate commission on sales made from links on this page.

Get Disney+