To discuss article changes, please use:
If you see comments on this page, they remain for archive purposes.
Okay, so I get why the links are the way they are. But I noticed that a lot of the entries aren't in any sort of alphabetical order. Okay to go ahead and fix that? George B. (talk) 06:08, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
- Chronological from start date would better fit with what we've done elsewhere. — Scott (talk) 06:12, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
Linky Link Link
- No, but thanks... It's best to link everything when there's a list format. If you're looking at a particular item further down the page, and one of the names isn't linked, then you have to search upwards to find that link. It's easier when everything's linked. The "link sanity" idea is for sentences and paragraphs. -- Danny (talk) 12:39, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
Projects with Unspecificied Numbers of Connections
How should a show like Pee-Wee's Playhouse be integrated into this list? There are a number of listed connections in both puppetry and animation, but the article is a little vague as to a specific number of connections (par inclusion here). "Several" being a key word in the article that makes inclusion here a little difficult. Thoughts on this matter? --Cantus Rock 21:24, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
- Just go through the credits on IMDb or elsewhere. That's how we do it on everything. I didn't list them all on that page since it wasn't the point, and this specific page was mainly a means of dealing with the gray Non-Muppet Productions area, using numbers only because that's how Movies with Multiple Muppet Show Guest Stars is organized. I'll probably get to it later, but if not, feel free to do the work yourself (but as far as I know, the only puppeteer connections are Alison Mork and Kevin Carlson, linked to from the page, and Bartlett and Canemaker are the only names I can recall as animators right now, though I think there's a few others who just don't have pages for their Sesame work). This isn't meant to sound cranky, by the way. It's just not something I personally feel like digging into right now. Really, I'd say just add in the names we have now, and the number can always shift later if/when more are discovered. -- Andrew Leal (talk) 21:37, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
World Wide Kids
- I can't find anything either, not even confirmation of its existance under that name. Apparently Nick added it. Andrew Leal (talk) 22:38, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
- Note that I don't know for sure that it's "not-Sesame", but I'm guessing it is. Can't have all of the characters parents heading off to war. -- Zanimum 18:41, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
Here's a reply to my inquiry, from Leslie's webmaster... -- Zanimum 14:41, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
The second DVD does not have any Sesame characters at all. Whole new thing. Whole new premise, etc...Same players though. I didn't get much information on it, other than no SS.
I believe that World Wide Kids is the name of the overall program. I think the outreach trips to foreign countries falls under this as well. Weather or not it is actually "public" or just the production company its falling under, etc. I really don't know. Might be a question for Sesame Workshop to make sure its accurate information.
Okay, I've just migrated info from six or so non-Muppet shows. The thing I'm not sure qhat to do with is other crew connections, like Mitchell Kriegman and Paul Andrejco on Big Big World. But other wise the page would be called "Non-Henson Productions with Multiple Muppet Production People" which is even more awkward than the present title. Maybe a sub-section for listing those? Andrew Leal (talk) 18:23, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- See the current discussion in Talk: Law & Order and I mentioned it on current events. Brad created Law & Order in non-Muppet productions, justifying it because more than 11 actors in Muppet or Henson shows had guest starred on it and it uses the same studio as Sesame Street. The question of dumping Non-Muppet Productions had previously arisen in the talk over the now deleted "Puppeteers" category. Where do we draw the line? I had to delete a Figment page recently. Andrew Leal (talk) 18:46, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- Oh. I thought the disclaimer at the top of those pages handled it. "Similarities from a production standpoint" should include Paul Andrejco and Mitchell Kriegman. Wouldn't it have been easier just to edit that text to clarify? But whatever. So, I guess Book of Pooh and Little Shop of Horrors and all those pages are being deleted? Seems like a waste. -- Scott (talk) 19:02, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- Not necessarily. Everything from Book of Pooh has been merged into Winnie the Pooh (reference, celebrity), and Blue's Room is all in the Blue (dog) celebrity page, minus some plot and supporting cast stuff. And that's the point of this list, Scott (and I guess a movie list now)! So any Muppet relevant info on shared performers/crew can be retained. What's on Little Shop of Horrors? Really, just a list of people. Big Big World has plot stuff and a full credits list, but do we need that? Even The Muppet Movie doesn't have a full credit listing yet. Andrew Leal (talk) 19:06, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- And Scott, please read the threads to get a full picture. I'd said the text could use clarification, than Danny said he wasn't sure we needed the category after all. Brad and I agreed. Sorry you missed the whole debate, but I'm running around and working pretty darn hard to make sure nothing of Muppet relevance is actually lost. Is it such a crime to lose the It's a Big Big World title card and not know who the wranglers are? (Though I am increasinly wishing that, when these topics come up and a statement is made that those things belong in a general puppetry Wiki, that there *was* a general puppetry Wiki. Hmmm.... If only I had time to mess around with a Wiki request...) Andrew Leal (talk) 19:09, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- I would suggest that redirects be created for the deleted pages to here. That way the links on the performer pages will still work. Also, can we rename the article yet again to Projects with Muppet Connections? I have a Wonder Woman book I've been meaning to add to the wiki and this is the perfect oppurtunity. -- Scott (talk) 19:11, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
I can't keep getting involved in past conversations on obscure talk pages. I missed it when the topic was hot, so I miss out. I'm fine with that. This talk page, there the conversation is relevant to the subject, helped me to better understand the policy change. So I'm good.
Also, Pigeon-Holed will be kept, but It's a Big Big World is going. That's what I meant. Just to clarify. But again, I'm good. I'll just tell him you were trying to eradicate his name from the wiki. Nyaaaah. -- Scott (talk) 19:26, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- Dude, the past conversation was last night. The obscure talk page was linked from Current events, from Andrew's note on your talk page, and by both Andrew and me on this talk page. The only reason you're missing out is because you won't bother to read the other page. That's really annoying. -- Danny (talk) 19:28, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- Alright, now the conversation's in two places. I just replied to you on my talk page. But I don't know where you got the idea that I didn't read the Law and Order page. I wouldn't have known to look at it until you mentioned it today. Changes were already happening and the conversation was too old for me to partake in. Don't be annoyed. I'm cool with not being a part of every conversation. It's my fault that I didn't look at Current Events when I know policy changes so quickly. -- Scott (talk) 19:33, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- Sympathy on the leg, Danny. Scott, why not add Holmes' Big Big World involvement to Pigeon Holed, as a trivia note or something? Dave Hirsch and I have been using The Electric Company page to note interesting things about the cast members who otherwise have no Muppet connection. Really, I'm running around trying to save every little scrap. All we're really losing is a title card, a PBS link, Melissa Creighton and her friends, and the fact that Big Big World has CG backgrounds and is a metaphor. And Kreigman's own page could be fleshed out to discuss the latter stuff. Andrew Leal (talk) 19:38, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- Oh yeah, I totally got that halfway through this talk page. Which has been helpful along with the L&O discussion (which I still maintain is an odd place to discuss the topic -- although admittedly I didn't know it was on CE until the changes were taking place).
- So, are we doing a page like this for movies too? -- Scott (talk) 19:44, 29 May 2006 (UTC)