No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
As Scott said in his previous message, we prefer consistency and want our segment descriptions to match. If you feel a segment description that appears on multiple pages is inaccurate or could be rephrased, you should either discuss it with administrator, or post about it on [[Special:Forum|the Forum]] and a conclusion can be made based on a majority consensus. |
As Scott said in his previous message, we prefer consistency and want our segment descriptions to match. If you feel a segment description that appears on multiple pages is inaccurate or could be rephrased, you should either discuss it with administrator, or post about it on [[Special:Forum|the Forum]] and a conclusion can be made based on a majority consensus. |
||
− | If a segment description has to be changed, it should be changed en masse on every page the segment appears in, but |
+ | If a segment description has to be changed, it should be changed en masse on every page the segment appears in, but it's best to discuss it first. |
Latest revision as of 22:02, 4 October 2019
Hi Steven. "Saying [a word] in sign language" is acceptable phrasing and not uncommon. "Signing [a word]" is fine as well, but either way works. The segment description on Episode 3780 is phrased the same way in every episode guide said segment appears in. Its appearances can be tracked here: Special:WhatLinksHere/File:3960r.jpg
As Scott said in his previous message, we prefer consistency and want our segment descriptions to match. If you feel a segment description that appears on multiple pages is inaccurate or could be rephrased, you should either discuss it with administrator, or post about it on the Forum and a conclusion can be made based on a majority consensus.
If a segment description has to be changed, it should be changed en masse on every page the segment appears in, but it's best to discuss it first.