Talk: Jbrangwynne53/@comment-5820415-20111014005112/@comment-455627-20111014011205

Latest revision as of 12:24, 14 July 2017

We discussed this several months ago on Current Events. There, I said "...I feel if a user has already gone to the trouble of putting [the apostrophe] in the link, there's really no point in taking it out." Of course there isn't an exact policy for it, but I just do that because it looks tidier on the page. It's all different stokes, so I don't think it should matter anyway.

Revision as of 01:22, 14 October 2011 (view source) Jbrangwynne53 (talk \| contribs) No edit summary ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 12:24, 14 July 2017 (view source) Scarecroe (talk \| contribs) No edit summary
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	We discussed this several months ago on [[~~Muppet Wiki~~:Current Events ~~Archive~~ 34 (2011)#Apostrophe/Link Question\|Current Events]]. There, I said "...I feel if a user has already gone to the trouble of putting [the apostrophe] in the link, there's really no point in taking it out." Of course there isn't an exact policy for it, but I just do that because it ''looks'' tidier on the page. It's all different stokes, so I don't think it should matter anyway. ~~<ac_metadata title="Message from Jonathan Brangwynne"> </ac_metadata>~~	+	We discussed this several months ago on [[User:MuppetArchives/Current Events 34 (2011)#Apostrophe/Link Question\|Current Events]]. There, I said "...I feel if a user has already gone to the trouble of putting [the apostrophe] in the link, there's really no point in taking it out." Of course there isn't an exact policy for it, but I just do that because it ''looks'' tidier on the page. It's all different stokes, so I don't think it should matter anyway.