Talk: Pokemonfanultimate/@comment-12385-20170327033216/@comment-12385-20170327040819

Latest revision as of 04:12, 27 March 2017

No, he was globally blocked (they just use the same message regardless: "This account has been disabled globally by user choice, or by Fandom."; which also goes over any previous local blocks). And either way, there's no point in responding to him a year later.

All it does is cause Jonathan to get a notification for activity to his page. It doesn't communicate with anybody.

Revision as of 04:09, 27 March 2017 (view source) Aleal (talk \| contribs) No edit summary ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 04:12, 27 March 2017 (view source) Aleal (talk \| contribs) No edit summary
Line 1:		Line 1:
	No, he was globally blocked (they just use the same message regardless: "This account has been disabled globally by user choice, or by Fandom."; which also goes over any previous local blocks). And either way, there's no point in responding to him a year later.		No, he was globally blocked (they just use the same message regardless: "This account has been disabled globally by user choice, or by Fandom."; which also goes over any previous local blocks). And either way, there's no point in responding to him a year later.
		+
		+	All it does is cause Jonathan to get a notification for activity to his page. It doesn't communicate with anybody.