Template:Talk This page is for determining which articles are quality articles. A quality article should exemplify Muppet Wiki's very best work. The award is given based on merit, and bestowed by an administrator after general consensus and discussion.

Nomination procedure:

  • Check the quality article criteria and ensure that the article meets all of them before nominating.
  • Place ===[[name of nominated article]]=== under the nomination heading here.
  • Below this title, write your reason for nominating the article and sign with ~~~~.

Supporting and objecting:

  • If you support a nomination, write *'''Support:''' followed by your reason(s).
  • If you oppose a nomination, write *'''Object:''' or *'''Oppose:''' followed by the reason(s). Each objection must provide a specific rationale that can be addressed. If nothing can be done in principle to address the objection, the administrators may ignore it when awarding.
  • Users who object are strongly encouraged to return a few days later to check whether their objection has been addressed.
  • Users can withdraw or change their objection or support at any time.
  • To provide constructive input on a nomination without explicitly supporting or objecting, write *'''Comment''' followed by your advice.

Awarding Quality status:

  • This process is still up for discussion, see talk page. (Each week an administrator will review the nominations and discussion. If they feel a nomination has had ample time for review, has overcome all objections and is up to quality article standard, than they can award "quality article" status to the nominees with the highest support.)


The Seven Deadly Sins

  • Nominate: This obscure topic is well researched and makes for an interesting read. — Scott (talk) 20:28, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Support: good depth of coverage, well sourced, nice flow and appropriate length. -- Brad D. (talk) 22:57, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Support: Absolutely, one of the best-researched articles. -- Danny (talk) 14:58, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Wonder Pig

  • Nominate: The article is thorough given the brief exposure she had on The Muppet Show. The production photograph is superior to episode screenshots and best represents the care taken in creating the costume. The article also thoroughly describes the character's origins and connections to the lineage of what she is spoofing. — Scott (talk) 20:28, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Oppose: It's a great article, but I don't like that picture. The shadow is weird and distracting to me. We have another Wonder Pig picture on the wiki; Scott and I have traded pictures back and forth a couple times. I hate to be a bitch about it, but there you are. -- Danny (talk) 15:22, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Neutral: What if we were able to come up with another Wonder Pig picture that everybody loved and could support? George B. (talk) 22:17, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Joseph McCarthy

  • Nominate: Well-written, well researched, fascinating read. — Scott (talk) 20:28, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Gorilla Suits

  • Nominate: Thorough, entertaining, well-written, good amount of imagery. — Scott (talk) 20:28, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Support: In-depth, informative, good use of images and well written. -- Brad D. (talk) 06:05, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Support: Yes. Very well-researched, comprehensive. -- Danny (talk) 15:00, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

The Jimmy Dean Show

  • Nominate - Brad D. (talk) 21:29, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Support - This is filled with great information, has nice supporting pictures and is well-sourced. I like this one. George B. (talk) 04:48, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Support - Well researched, even if our current info on appearances is limited. — Scott (talk) 04:12, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Support: I agree, I think it's a well-researched and comprehensive page. -- Danny (talk) 15:20, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Rowlf the Dog

  • Nominate - Brad D. (talk) 21:29, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Support: It's a nice article, there's a lot of good information. -- Danny (talk) 15:23, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Episode 111: A Wagon of a Different Color

  • Nominate: I wanted to get this one onto here because we made into sort of a team project. Through various work, we got the more-detailed summary to an appropriate length and a nice picture was also added as well. It has good details about the content of the episode, plus information about a related book, video releases and other details. - George B. (talk) 21:14, 14 January 2007 (UTC)


  • Nominate: I think it's funny, well-written and comprehensive. It's about as close as we can get on Muppet Wiki to a humor piece, but it's also informative about the way China has been represented on the show. It includes interesting quotes from reviews in a clever way. -- Danny (talk) 15:31, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Pigs in Space

  • Nominate: Comprehensive and well-written, with a visual guide to every sketch. The space shuttle note is interesting, and well-sourced. The merchandise section is complete and informative. -- Danny (talk) 18:09, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.

Fandom may earn an affiliate commission on sales made from links on this page.

Stream the best stories.

Fandom may earn an affiliate commission on sales made from links on this page.

Get Disney+